This has been a crappy week, at least inside. Events have not been conspiring against me, nor have any super villains, yet the pressure within keeps building. I resolved not to write about this aspect long ago, but I've decided that, what with the private blog (and maybe 35 people actually reading it), I'll delve a little deeper than usual.
I have a great deal of privacy at work. As long as I stay in my immediate work area, I am securely by myself as much as six hours a night. And so, I have my best opportunities to be Leslie. It's not a high risk proposition, but even a little risk with one's career borders on the colossally stupid. Still, these parts of me must be expressed, and my home is becoming more problematic as a true option. That is effed up.
I was in a chat last night, and it was observed just how backward this situation is. My home should be the one place where it is always safe to be myself. Well, it just isn't. Twice this week, while I was computing late at night, my boy has wandered downstairs looking for blankets, or whatever. In my perfect world, I would've been full-Leslie when he appeared. Happily, I was not. This is the ginormous flaw in the arrangement that Mrs. Leslie has given her blessing to. It is not a safe situation for me to be me. I have to release this pressure somewhere.
Honestly, working in skirt, heels, bra, etc., allows me to be more productive. I sit for longer periods, and feel more content, less restless and distracted. I see it as moderate risk, high reward.
Moving on, Saturday at 4pm, I learned that Mrs. L intended us to attend a party at 7pm. News to me. Half an hour later, I learned that it was a costume party. This is very short notice, don't you think? I have a real problem with people in costumes. When I'm at my support group, what others might take as costumes are actually people stripped of their costumes and being themselves. I feel so at home there. Disguises are alienating. I don't like interacting with others in costume, and I don't like role-playing for myself. On a related note, I don't like clowns.
As Mrs. L was suggesting lame ideas for me, I started to get quite agitated, which eventually turned into an anxiety attack. I don't want to be Bono, or a Republican, or any other half-baked excuse. Secretly, I started thinking of what I could do in female garb, though I knew she would neither suggest it nor agree to it, especially with two of the kids coming with us. I wanted to be Christine O'Donnell, who is running for Senate in Delaware. She's a Sarah Palin doppelganger, if that means something to European readers. She once admitted to dabbling in witchcraft. One ad this fall had her speaking to the camera, "I'm not a witch. I'm you." I could do this, with our similar look and clothing tastes.
Anyway, I'd have needed approval and several more hours to make it happen. Another pipe dream turned to pipe bomb. I've always said that dressing female for Halloween is not for me, but this time I wanted to do it, and do it well, not campy. So, I wound up going in my normal street clothes. Mrs. L was kinda gothic, long black busty dress and black wig. I did enjoy sitting in the kitchen, chatting with the ladies, so it wasn't a total loss.
The current situation would seem to call for a conversation with the missus. Not sure when that might happen. My therapy has been moved to alternate Mondays, and I am quite ready to spill to her this Monday. I am wound tight.
Musings: It's All About Community
5 hours ago

Oh Leslie, what does such lack of communication say about how she is treating you? This is not how coupled relationships are supposed to work, she gets to have fun, you get to stew in torment surrounded by people having fun!
ReplyDeleteLost for words after minutes staring at the screen, hope monday works something out.
Caroline xxx
Oh how we wish to hear those words "honey, let's work together to help you to have a good time and express your other side."
ReplyDeleteYou know I share that hole in the heart; one more internal shift to that far side of the 'bridge of trolls'.
Big Hug,
Halle
I have had a wander about and think about this. I have been thinking about the evolution of my own relationship with Julie who was accepting but less than thrilled when the androgynous "guy" came out and told her the deeper truth. I have to be honest and admit that I had been eliminating the facial hair for some while but she still saw " my guy".
ReplyDeleteWhere are we now? Having lived through the slow feminising of features and seeing the happiness of the last six months since I came out fully to the world and the acceptance which others have shown, she has herself become happier living with someone who is finally glad to be alive AND she appears to be falling back in love with the new me. It is not something you can easily define but lots of small moments and touches which say so much more than words.
The leap of imagination from where you are now in your relationship and how it would feel in the position which I now find myself in is not one which I could see someone ever making let alone your partner but if you could taste it for a few minutes...
I wonder how many relationships would survive if that little time and effort was made rather than the knee jerk decision to part.
Caroline xxx
Oh Leslie, I was going to say "familiar territory" in that you know I've been negotiating some similar issues around "space and expression". However I finally have changed my mind about your position.
ReplyDeleteYour wife is unlikely to be a fool, she knows precisely what the "costume party" could mean. The adult thing to do is to talk, for her to say her fears and even to state her boundaries. Instead you are manipulated into a position that removes you from the negotiation. Comply or else. This is not a model of marriage as a partnership. Nor is it the first time, and indeed your role in this relationship seems to be "support me when I need you and then do as you're told"
I face similar issues, but we at least try to communicate and accommodate. We don't have a perfect marriage, but at least it is a partnership of equals. Yours is not.
Sorry to be blunt, Leslie; and ignore my comments if they are off target.
I have reluctantly to find myself seeing some truth in Claire's assessment.It would be of benefit to Mrs L as well as to you to meet you half way.
ReplyDeleteMy sentiments echo Claire's as well. Only three hours notice of a costume party sounds very calculated to me, not to mention extremely disrespectful.
ReplyDeleteBy not allowing you any safe outlet for personal expression, your wife is forcing you into a situation where you are risking your employment. If for some reason your boss decides to drop in on you unannounced (it could happen), and finds you sitting there in a skirt and heels, it will awfully difficult to explain it to him in a way that will restore his confidence in you. I worry for you, girl.
MelissA XX
I'm with Melissa on this one. I think you were had. The 3 hours notice was very calculated. And I have to agree with Claire, you are to "support me when I need you and then do as you're told" or else!
ReplyDeleteMy perceptions of Mrs. L. now must slant to the manipulative as well as oppressive.
I think you dearly need to negotiate for more space. Once a month TransKY meetings which you frequently miss is just not going to cut it. The proof of that is your job behavior. Though my guess is you'll take every minute of Leslie time you can get, even if it expands to include more outings.
You know well, I don't face the marital issues. But the risk to career, financial stability, and a decent future are enormous for us both. Remember the book? Remember the cops? @#$% happens dear friend; don't let it be too bad for you by getting caught at work.
Sylvia
P.S. I've always been amused that the words "Marital" and "Martial" are so close in spelling.
One of those hackneyed phrases heard all over the place is that one must "be prepared to lose everything". But even if there is a glint of truth in it I am fairly sure that it was never meant to include the thought of intentionally hastening the loss of anything (read: job) just so one could fit into the stereotype.
ReplyDeleteI heartily recommend not doing anything that may put your employment at risk, or even cause them to question your stability or reliability. You said you consider it low risk and I am not proposing any sort of life that involves taking no risks at all, but I can personally attest to the fact that losing one's employment is a very sucky position to be in. The irony is that, in one/many possible futures, doing anything at all in a skirt, heels and bra will be simply irrelevant. I went to church that way yesterday, with the addition of a blouse. The only significance of what I was wearing was that I am old fashioned and I still believe in wearing my Sunday finest to go to church, I don't do jeans and tennies.
Pipe dream to pipe bomb is a beautifully turned phrase.
ReplyDeleteI have nothing of real value to add in terms of advice or sympathy which is here in good supply, but I know good writing when I see it, and this is good.
I too, do not like clowns. What ever are we to do with them?
Petra
Well, Claire said it all. This situation just does not seem to be getting better, does it? And, telling you about a costume party with 3 hours notice? As the others said, this was calculated.
ReplyDeleteCan't offer you anything here, Leslie other than my sympathy. It really stinks that you have to go through this.
For what it's worth, I absolutely hate costume parties and have only been to one. I went as a hippie and got to wear a beautiful long hair wig. I didn't want to take it off!
Calie xxx
Leslie,
ReplyDeleteI had to take another look at Christine O'Donnell. Mental snapshot. ;)
I'll join the chorus in that you have to make other arrangements besides your work. What if Mrs. L were to take the kids for a fun day out or to a relative's so you could concentrate on 'work' at home? And have the courtesy to call a while before returning so Leslie has a chance to depart. However if you were to come out at work, at least to those you would most likely run into, it wouldn't be such a shock if they were to run into Leslie. You have a better feel for your co workers comfort level there than anyone here or myself.
It isn't easy doing what comes naturally to us in the presence of children. Amy and Jim did "trunk r treat" at their church again this year. While we all had fun in spite of my having to remain underneath, sometime I would like to be Sarah at one of these shindigs. But as I think about it, wherever Amy and Jim would go, there would be some explanation in order to say the least. So, for the meantime I guess I'll have to be resigned to suffer in silence. Sigh. If there is a bright spot to this, it's the sisterhood among us.
Clare,
"Comply or else." "support me when I need you and then do as you're told" Ouch! I'll have to admit it's not easy when Jim and Amy (and I) try to come to an understanding, then somehow the conversation gets hijacked. It's all downhill from there. I feel I'm not alone in this. I think I found in Leslie another traveling companion. I know that this isn't easy on the women we live with any more than it is on the women who live in us. It's not something that they can share with friends and family. But it's not an excuse to take it out on the people closest to us and make things intentionally difficult. I feel that if we work at it, we can all get what we want and need. The key word is "reasonable."
Sarah
http://survivingtheworld.net/Lesson786.html
ReplyDeleteSarah