Hmmm, I'm not writing much, am I?
Not much new on the gender front. I broke out the shorts last weekend for the first time. Almost immediately, the missus whispered to me, wondering if I should be revealing my bare legs. I proceeded to show her the six weeks of growth which is quite visible on my legs (especially to me!). She said that she hadn't realized. Within five minutes, I was feeling so self-conscious that I changed into long pants. She then said that it was okay, and I didn't need to do that, but the mental ship had sailed for me.
She was actually apologetic about it at bedtime, that night and the next. She sensed that I had my feelings hurt to some degree, and she was right. If I'm going to have to grow this hair for her, she should at least notice it. It seems that she had been sensing the smoothness of my half-calf(tm) epilating. We talked some about my bald shins, bald since my teen years with no outside help. She accepted that this phenomenon must have been what she mistook for bare legs. Her apology was welcome and helpful.
On a very different front, I have been battling the urge to send a nastygram to my boy's private school. He was having a lot of trouble learning the European countries. We bought an up-to-date atlas, and found a good website that would quiz him. We worked on it for several weeks. So, he took his test last Monday, and we learned some surprising information. It seems that their materials are a bit antiquated, yet being presented as current. Yes, he was expected to know about Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia and East Germany and the Soviet Union!
Some of you already know my intense interest in geography and history. To say that I was appalled would be understating it. If they had been studying the Cold War, this could have been presented as historical geography, but it has no more relevance to the present day than Prussia or the Austro-Hungarian Empire, especially to a twelve-year-old.
My boy would have had a much easier time memorizing the Europe of 1987, as it had about twenty fewer nations to identify. I am sorely tempted to ask for a month's tuition to be refunded. We have spent an enormous amount of money on this school over the last dozen or so years. My middle child also corroborated the story, as we learned that she had used the same materials when she was in the sixth grade. Grrrrr! The school has lost a lot of credibility with me, needless to say.
After a week of ruminating, the sarcasm has diminished. I feel that I can now write a fairly civil email to the teacher, expressing disappointment instead of outrage. I think that it does need to be said, and I need to insist that they invest some of their dollars in some modern geographic materials. I mean, really!
Musings: It's All About Community
5 hours ago

How does a school maintain it's accreditation, when it doesn't bother to keep its teaching materials up to date. I could understand it if the geographical changes just took place, but most occurred two decades ago. Inexcusable! That would lead me to question the rest of the curriculum as well. Is it by any chance a church school? Not that all church schools are bad, some are actually quite good.
ReplyDeleteUnless you wear tall socks, how do you explain the half-calf (tm)?
Melissa XX
What happened to the Soviet Union? Some of our Atlases still have the Austro - Hungarian empire and lots of blanks round the rest of the world!
ReplyDeleteCaroline xx
Please tell me he was not penalized for having the correct information. There is nothing more devastating to a young mind. Hopefully, the teacher took advantage of his up to date information to teach the class and boost his self-esteem instead! One can hope.
ReplyDeleteIt's a Montessori school, and we've been pleased over the years. That's why this was so upsetting to me. It's such a departure for them, and it exemplifies why Americans are so lackluster in geography.
ReplyDelete@Melissa - My lower legs are largely bald to start with, so I'm really only removing a fringe around my ankle, and some hair on the back of my calves. It's not a huge stretch to believe that it's natural, if one already is acquainted with my boy legs. And she is.
Oh, and he got full credit for knowing the real world. They were a bit surprised when he couldn't find Macedonia on their sorry-ass map.
ReplyDeleteLeslie has boy legs?
ReplyDeleteCaroline xxx
Sadly, yes, more than half the year. Unmistakeably boy legs.
ReplyDeleteIf it's 1989 in Geography class, write 1989's dollar figure on the cheque when you pay the fees.
ReplyDeleteI take your news of Mrs. L as positive.
Leslie, as you and Jenny know, I am very keen on geography because it has much to do with a particular hobby of mine.
ReplyDeleteTo have a school teaching out-of-date geography is just inexcusable. I am often so embarrassed for our typical American who can't even identify the individual states, doesn't have a clue as to what provinces are in Canada and, of course, has absolutely no idea where Europe is on the map much less what a nice place Croatia is to visit.
How's that hair loss stuff going for you, Leslie? Was it Procerin? Perhaps it makes leg hair grow faster too?
Calie xxx
That is worth worrying about on many levels! I'm hoping they are at least teaching this material with the caveat that this data no longer applies. I would be particularly bothered to hear they are presenting false information as fact, otherwise known as lying.
ReplyDeleteIt's wonderful to see parents who care this much about their kids, Leslie.
Interesting about the hair growth. My leg hair is actually heaviest on my shins, with a much lighter showing above the knees, on the back of my calves and around the ankles. I epilate my shins far more often than any other area - and that's often, now that summer is here in Arizona and I'm in capris for work!
ReplyDeleteSorry I missed you online last night. Couldn't keep my eyes open...
@ Calie - It's finesteride, and no, I am not seeing results yet after four or so months. I have been informed by a friend, though, that she started seeing some new hair around the nine month mark. If all I see is new growth on my legs, I think I will regard the experiment as a failure.
ReplyDeleteThe school's teaching of inaccurate geography is terrible. I think that geography is very important and often underappreciated.
ReplyDeleteThe lack of understanding by Americans of our own geography, as well as the geography of the rest of the world, makes us look terrible. It was a much bigger deal outside the US that Obama talked about our "57" states. John Kerry would not have made that error. At least Kerry knows that it is Heinz with "57" varieties not the US with 57 states.
Pat